@4ta2r 1. are you … @4ta2r 1. are you serious? he calls himself a lawyer and an afterlife investigator, ’nuff said 2. why are you bringing up david hume when he himself argues against religion, and says that we as human beings need to rely on induction despite the “problem of induction” you were referring to 3. and if you can walk away why have you been replying to every single one of my posts, ALSO you’re the one that’s hostile, so who’s the insecure one now? i LOVE how hypocritical religious ppl are, dont you?
@darknessvirtue 1. … @darknessvirtue 1. look up victor zammit for the god comments 2. Watch a david hume video and come back and talk once you have an argument for the induction fallacy 3. My confidence can handle walking away from an argument on youtube, can yours? Trying to prove your point of view with hostility only entails insecurity.
@4ta2r LOL the fact … @4ta2r LOL the fact that your still talking makes me laugh. and btw i never said philosophy was pointless, i only said you can’t apply it to the real world, the only use for it is a good mind workout that leads you nowhere, if you want to prove something you’ve got to use science instead of sitting around and thinking of what could be if so and so were true, “OHH if only my senses were FALLABLE then GOD IS REAL, but since im religious ill just say that’s true, therefore, GOD=REALZ dur dur durr”
@darknessvirtue It … @darknessvirtue It is also very unscientific to assume i am religious because I suggested a proof for god. You think I am not debating you because I think I will lose? What’s the point of arguing if you are not going to listen? What is the point of arguing with someone who thinks philosophy is pointless and gets joy out of finding errors in syntax? You are smug, and you are an asshole, and you depress me, and I just don’t have the energy right now to care.
@4ta2r lollol ur … @4ta2r lollol ur the for saying there’s actually proof of god, thanks for the “proof” kbye! oh and i love how religious ppl just love to ragequit every argument when something goes over their head, keep it up!
@darknessvirtue I … @darknessvirtue I am going to counter you simply asking this, if your senses are fallible, then is there such a thing as the real world? Quantum physics is looking in to this in a few ways.
@4ta2r philosophy … @4ta2r philosophy doesn’t apply to the real world, unlike science, so if you actually have legit, scientific evidence i’m sure more people would know about it
@D4R3W It actually … @D4R3W It actually takes hours to explain but, my source comes from a lot of philosophy books i’ve read over the years. If i find something, i will send it to ya.
i can’t explain … i can’t explain here, but this is something that philosophers have spent ages bickering over, some it sounds pretty convincing in proving god logically.
@Jemalacane Ah but … @Jemalacane Ah but the right conditions is not a preset, it is a wide range of combinations of factors – Just look at the variety of environments here on earth in which we’ve found life!
“The word God is … “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
“The word God is … “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
“This most … “This most beautiful system [The Universe] could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.” Isaac Newton
“Trials are medicines which our gracious and wise Physician prescribes because we need them; and he proportions the frequency and weight of them to what the case requires. Let us trust his skill and thank him for his preion.”
Isaac Newton
“Before God we are all equally wise – and equally foolish.” Albert Einstein
@Jemalacane I’m … @Jemalacane I’m afraid you’re mistaken – it is not a coincidence that the earth has all the right conditions for thousands of species ; rather, thousands of species are suited for the conditions that are present on the earth – remember please, that the earth was here long before there was life on it at all ; life adjusts to the circumstances. Adjusting the circumstances to fit life is what technology does.
Alas, the earth is but a pale blue dot in the universe.
Remember, the … Remember, the complexity and beauty in the universe was an accident.
No one was behind human DNA being based on the most complex code ever. There was no intelligence behind the greatest super computer being in the human skull. The fact that the Earth has all of the right conditions for thousands of species is a coincidence.
http://www.myspace.com/the_rev_tyson
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@MetaLMunchies …
@MetaLMunchies AAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
blue grey monster …
blue grey monster at 4:41
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@Cdubzhappy Well put
@Cdubzhappy Well put
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@4ta2r 1. are you …
@4ta2r 1. are you serious? he calls himself a lawyer and an afterlife investigator, ’nuff said 2. why are you bringing up david hume when he himself argues against religion, and says that we as human beings need to rely on induction despite the “problem of induction” you were referring to 3. and if you can walk away why have you been replying to every single one of my posts, ALSO you’re the one that’s hostile, so who’s the insecure one now? i LOVE how hypocritical religious ppl are, dont you?
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@darknessvirtue 1. …
@darknessvirtue 1. look up victor zammit for the god comments 2. Watch a david hume video and come back and talk once you have an argument for the induction fallacy 3. My confidence can handle walking away from an argument on youtube, can yours? Trying to prove your point of view with hostility only entails insecurity.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@4ta2r LOL the fact …
@4ta2r LOL the fact that your still talking makes me laugh. and btw i never said philosophy was pointless, i only said you can’t apply it to the real world, the only use for it is a good mind workout that leads you nowhere, if you want to prove something you’ve got to use science instead of sitting around and thinking of what could be if so and so were true, “OHH if only my senses were FALLABLE then GOD IS REAL, but since im religious ill just say that’s true, therefore, GOD=REALZ dur dur durr”
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@darknessvirtue It …
@darknessvirtue It is also very unscientific to assume i am religious because I suggested a proof for god. You think I am not debating you because I think I will lose? What’s the point of arguing if you are not going to listen? What is the point of arguing with someone who thinks philosophy is pointless and gets joy out of finding errors in syntax? You are smug, and you are an asshole, and you depress me, and I just don’t have the energy right now to care.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@4ta2r lollol ur …
@4ta2r lollol ur the for saying there’s actually proof of god, thanks for the “proof” kbye! oh and i love how religious ppl just love to ragequit every argument when something goes over their head, keep it up!
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@darknessvirtue I …
@darknessvirtue I don’t have time for assholes.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@4ta2r so your …
@4ta2r so your proof is by asking me an if statement, how very scientific of you
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@darknessvirtue I …
@darknessvirtue I am going to counter you simply asking this, if your senses are fallible, then is there such a thing as the real world? Quantum physics is looking in to this in a few ways.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@4ta2r philosophy …
@4ta2r philosophy doesn’t apply to the real world, unlike science, so if you actually have legit, scientific evidence i’m sure more people would know about it
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@D4R3W It actually …
@D4R3W It actually takes hours to explain but, my source comes from a lot of philosophy books i’ve read over the years. If i find something, i will send it to ya.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@4ta2r
Then give …
@4ta2r
Then give us a link or something. I’m very interested in what this proof is all about.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
i can’t explain …
i can’t explain here, but this is something that philosophers have spent ages bickering over, some it sounds pretty convincing in proving god logically.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@Jemalacane Yep, it …
@Jemalacane Yep, it sure would.. yet we went there because we dared to ask the question if we could.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@GronTheMighty …
@GronTheMighty Unprotected, space would kill a person in seconds.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@Jemalacane Bear in …
@Jemalacane Bear in mind also, we have existed in space, and on the moon…
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@Jemalacane Ah but …
@Jemalacane Ah but the right conditions is not a preset, it is a wide range of combinations of factors – Just look at the variety of environments here on earth in which we’ve found life!
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
“The word God is …
“The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
Albert Einstein
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
“The word God is …
“The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
Albert Einstein
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
“This most …
“This most beautiful system [The Universe] could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.” Isaac Newton
“Trials are medicines which our gracious and wise Physician prescribes because we need them; and he proportions the frequency and weight of them to what the case requires. Let us trust his skill and thank him for his preion.”
Isaac Newton
“Before God we are all equally wise – and equally foolish.” Albert Einstein
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@GronTheMighty No! …
@GronTheMighty No! You have to have the right conditions for life or else there would be none!
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
@Jemalacane I’m …
@Jemalacane I’m afraid you’re mistaken – it is not a coincidence that the earth has all the right conditions for thousands of species ; rather, thousands of species are suited for the conditions that are present on the earth – remember please, that the earth was here long before there was life on it at all ; life adjusts to the circumstances. Adjusting the circumstances to fit life is what technology does.
Alas, the earth is but a pale blue dot in the universe.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
Remember, the …
Remember, the complexity and beauty in the universe was an accident.
No one was behind human DNA being based on the most complex code ever. There was no intelligence behind the greatest super computer being in the human skull. The fact that the Earth has all of the right conditions for thousands of species is a coincidence.